Case Study Analysis and Solutions

Case ID: 214001

Abstract:
Case Solution & Analysis for The TELUS Share Conversion Proposal by Lucy White, Benjamin C. Esty, Lisa Mazzanti
On February 21, 2013, TELUS announced a proposal to convert the firm's non-voting shares into voting shares on a one-to-one basis, thereby eliminating the firm's dual class structure. Shareholders were scheduled to vote on the proposal at the firm's annual general meeting (AGM) on May 9, 2013. Despite strong support from management, the board, two proxy advisory firms, and several large shareholders, the proposal was opposed by Mason Capital Management, a New York-based hedge fund. Mason, which controlled almost 20% of the voting shares and a large short position in the non-voting shares, had filed a dissident proxy circular recommending that shareholders vote against the proposal based on both procedural and substantive grounds. With the success of the vote in doubt, the board had to decide what to do. Should they proceed with the vote as planned, postpone the vote with the intention of re-introducing the proposal at some point in the future, or cancel the proposal for good? And what should they do with Mason, which management viewed as an "empty voter" in this matter?

Keywords:
Business ownership, Capital structure, Corporate governance, Return on investment, Shareholder relations, Valuation, The TELUS Share Conversion Proposal Case Solution

Click Here to place your order

OR

Contact us directly at ordercasesolutions@gmail.com if you want to solve the above case.